Conformation Analysis
Is your horse a riding horse?
From his conformation, you can determine what type of activity best
suits your equine companion.
By Deb Bennett, PhD
There are hundreds of equine breeds, some ancient, some relatively new,
but all horses can be classified as one of only five types: riding horses,
racehorses, carriage horses, draft horses and “projects.”
Let’s begin by defining “project horses.” In terms of conformation, these
animals fall into two categories. The first is the horse with one or more
serious conformational flaws. This animal simply is not a very good-quality
horse, not a very good athlete and not likely to stay sound. In the second
category is the horse with no serious flaws, but who is not adapted for the
type of work you plan to do.
For the highly motivated and committed, projects are the very soil in which
finer horsemanship is nurtured. But a project horse will never flatter you
or make your job easy. Managing a project, therefore, does not appeal to
very many people, and even those who are devoted to their projects succumb
to fantasies about owning an “easier” horse, one who is made to ride.
The Riding Horse
The primary requirement of a riding horse is to bear a rider’s weight upon
the freespan of his back without strain. Ideally, the horse coils his loins,
“rounds up” and goes onto the bit easily, and his conformation contributes
to his success and his continuing soundness. Therefore, riding horses possess
the following structural requirements:
• an excellent loin coupling, which is broad, short, smooth and strong,
yet flexible for coiling. The circumference about the loin
and groin is about the same as the heart girth.
• overall body balance that is nearly level or even “uphill.”
• a short or medium freespan of the back.
• a neck that is set high on the shoulder, meaning that the vertebral
curve at the base of the neck is shallow. This shape of
neck naturally tends to arch and “turn over” well.
• a long shoulder, covering a deep chest. Depending on the horse’s use,
his shoulder angle can range from fairly steep (about 62 degrees) to well
laid-back (about 45 degrees).
• a medium to wide chest.
• withers that are at least moderately high, with spines that slope
well backwards. The peak of the withers lies well behind the elbow.
• a pelvis that constitutes at least 30 percent of the body length and
slopes from 18 to 22 degrees.
• a relatively long thighbone (femur), conveying a slow, smooth hind
stride.
• “normal” stifle and hock angles.
• well-aligned limbs with large, square joints. They are also substantial—cannon-tendon
circumference equals eight inches or more per 1,000 pounds of weight. It’s
especially important for riding horses to have broad hocks as seen from front
or rear.
• total body weight less than 1,450 pounds.
Weight-carrying ability—the single most important characteristic of riding
horses—is not conferred by increased height. Statistics from South American
military trials, as well as from North American endurance tests, indicate
that weight-carrying ability is primarily a function of body breadth, especially
over the top of the loins. Few tall horses -- over 16 hands -- meet the breadth
requirement while at the same time staying within the weight limit. Potential
soundness plummets as weight exceeds 1,450 pounds. Therefore, a smart rider
chooses a broad-backed horse that is just tall enough to fit him.
THE CONFORMATION OF THE IDEAL RACEHORSE IS QUITE DIFFERENT FROM THAT
OF THE IDEAL RIDING HORSE.
(A) Analytical drawing of a good-quality riding horse.
Stipple shows the vertebral column. The overall body balance is close
to level.
(B) Classic-distance racehorse.
(C) Sprint racer.
(D) Carriage horse.
(E) Draft horse.
(F) A cob.
The Racehorse
While it’s true that many racehorses are ridden, weight-carrying is not the
goal of racing. Sheer speed is. Thus, the nature of the task makes the conformation
of the ideal racehorse quite different from the conformation of the ideal
riding horse. This is particularly true concerning body balance. Although
lightness is desirable in a riding horse, on the racetrack it is “the kiss
of death,” because any racehorse that becomes light while running -- raises
his forehand relative to his hindquarters -- will transfer support to the
hind legs and slow down. Racehorses are therefore built “downhill,” and the
shorter the distance over which the horse was bred to be raced, the more
downhill his body balance is likely to be. When the structure of the racehorse
is compared to that of the riding horse these similarities and differences
are evident:
• The loin is longer and narrower over the top, permitting maximum flexibility
for deepest loin-coiling.
• Overall body balance is downhill.
• The freespan of the back is medium (in timber racers, steeplechasers
and horses going more than a mile) to long (in sprinters and milers).
• The neck is light, flat and projects straight to the front, meaning
that it is set lower on the shoulder and that the vertebral column within
forms a deeper, more open curve at the base.
• The shoulder is very long, covering a maximally deep chest.
• The chest is narrow, but not so narrow that the forelimbs interfere
with one another.
• The withers are the same as in a riding horse.
• The pelvis is longer than 33 percent of the body length and slopes
close to 22 degrees.
• The femur is relatively short, conferring a quick, efficient stroke.
• The angles at stifle and hock are wide open, guaranteeing the efficient
transfer of thrust energy from the rump muscles to the ground.
• The limbs are the same as in a riding horse, though even small misalignments
(offsets, rotations, deviations) or errors in hoof trimming (unbalanced feet)
are much more likely to cause breakdowns in working racehorses. Ideally, the
front limbs must meet the minimum requirement for substance and are perfectly
aligned.
• The total weight does not exceed 1,450 pounds.
The Carriage Horse
This classification includes any horse bred primarily for harness, whether
meant for pulling heavy carriages, stylishly stepping along in front of a
buggy or racing in front of a sulky. Warmbloods, which were until 50 years
ago primarily adapted for carriage use, still show many carriage-horse characteristics.
The carriage horse compares to the riding horse in the following ways:
• The loin is the same; frequently, it is superior.
• Overall body balance is the same; often it goes slightly uphill.
• The freespan of the back is the same—short to medium.
• The neck is long and set lower on the shoulder, coupling an elegant
appearance with a naturally high head carriage.
• The shoulder slopes backwards considerably in the heavier types, to
facilitate the wearing of a collar. Sloping shoulders confer low, sweeping
movement unless they are coupled at greater than 90 degrees with a long,
steep arm. For maximum “motion” in the lighter breeds, the shoulder is fairly
steep—about 60 degrees—and the angle formed at the point of shoulder is wider
open than 90 degrees.
• The chest is wide or very wide.
• The withers are moderate.
• The pelvis is 30 percent of the body length, but a shorter pelvis
is not a great disadvantage. Likewise, the pelvis can be more toward the
horizontal.
• The femur is medium to long.
• The angles at stifle and hock are “normal.” The hocks are broad in
front or rear view.
• The limbs are substantial and well aligned.
• lhe horse’s weight is in accordance with the weight of the vehicle
he is expected to pull.
WARMBLOODS, WHICH WERE UNTIL 50 YEARS AGO
PRIMARILY ADAPTED FOR CARRIAGE USE, RETAIN
MANY CARRIAGE-HORSE CHARACTERISTICS.
This list makes it clear that in many ways, carriage horses are like riding
horses. To change a carriage breed into a riding breed strictly in terms
of form, a horseman only has to select for a medium-length, arched neck set
high on the shoulders, and a sloping pelvis; the other characteristics stay
the same. However, it is important to note that there is no upper weight
limit for the carriage horse; therefore, to convert the heavier breeds, the
weight must be reduced. An easy way to achieve these goals is to cross carriage
breeds with Thoroughbreds or Arabians. This was first done in the early 19th
century by the creators of the Standardbred.
The Draft Horse
Horses of draft type existed in western Europe and the British Isles before
mankind domesticated the species Equus caballus.. However, I am referring
to what most people today consider draft horses to be—tall, massive animals
suitable for pulling the heaviest loads. The giant size of the modern draft
breeds is a product of the advent of railroads. By 1850, huge, massive animals
standing more than 16 hands and weighing at least 2,000 pounds were being
produced in Britain and on the Continent to take loads to the railway stations.
Such massiveness stretches the biomechanical limits of the equine body and
imposes strict limitations on what draft horses can do and remain sound.
The structure of the draft horse compares to that of the riding horse in
the following ways:
• The loin is the same. Although a good drafter has a broad back, in
many the coupling is not very smooth.
• The overall body balance is as in a racehorse—downhill to keep the
traction against the collar and the angle of draft low.
• The freespan of the back is the same as in a racehorse—medium to long
to keep the animal on the forehand.
• The neck is of medium length and set very high on the shoulder. This
facilitates wearing the collar, as well as pulling ability. Many draft horses
have beautifully shaped and set necks.
• The shoulder slopes backward considerably, again to make the collar
fit better. Many draft horses have beautiful shoulders.
• The chest is wide or very wide.
• The withers are moderate, not knifelike, to facilitate the collar.
• The pelvis is 30 percent of the body length and as steep as 35 degrees
to make starting the load easier, a maneuver that requires the drafter to
coil his loins powerfully, then dig in with hind and forelegs.
• The femur is short, conferring both first-gear “jump-start” capabilities
and “granny-low” for all-day traction.
• The angles at stifle and hock are “normal” or somewhat straight, as
in racehorses, to ensure efficient thrust against the ground. It is as important
for a draft horse to have wide hocks as for a carriage or riding horse.
• The limbs are substantial and well aligned.
• No matter what the animal’s height, his total weight is in accordance
with the weight of the load he is expected to pull.
BECAUSE BOTH HAVE DOWNHILL BODY BALANCE, THE CROSS BETWEEN DRAFT AND
RACE TYPES IS THE LEAST LIKELY TO PRODUCE BALANCED RIDING HORSES.
This list shows that in many ways, draft horses are more similar to racehorses
than they are to riding horses. The advantages that a well-conformed draft
stallion would bring to a riding-horse breeding program would be to improve
the shape of the neck and the lay-back of the shoulder and perhaps to broaden
the back. Crosses between draft and other types produce cobs, which can be
very good riding horses. Because both have downhill body balance, the cross
between draft and race types is the least likely to produce balanced riding
horses.
Nor are draft horses particularly adapted to bearing weight; huge size
does not confer weight-carrying ability. Moreover, great weight predisposes
unsoundness. Although they have increased the animals’ weight through selective
breeding, draft-horse producers have been unable to obtain a proportional
increase in bone. No large draft horse possesses eight inches of bone per
1,000 pounds of weight—by this standard, a 2,000-pound drafter would have
to have a 16-inch cannon-tendon circumference. Statistics instead show that
modern draft horses average only five inches of bone per 1,000 pounds (10
inches of bone on the 2,000-pound horse). This is fine, so long as the adult
animal is never expected to produce suspended gaits and does most of his
work at a walk. However, since suspension—thrusting the body clear of the
ground—is a necessary quality in riding horses that trot or canter, they
cannot be massive and be expected to remain sound.
*****************************